Fingerprinting of parents of nursery school children is of course, “not planned”.
… = … Come in, Children, Eat, Relax, Obey……
As usual, Mr No-One, is planning to extend this scheme.In fact, more cleverly than is normally the case, he does not even get a mention.
Honeycomb Solutions (I bet you 50p that 90% of firms called “solutions” are hand-in-c*** glove with stalinist statists) says this. the article positively shimmers with all the statist planning buzzwords, and has prbably been written by the Department for Child Abuse Children (I expect there is one.)
As a Libertarian, one understands the concerns of the two parents of a child, for the wellbeing of their property, which is to say: the child. However, the fears of the majority about such things as abduction, molestation, paedophilia, assaults on children, and the like, all no more common now than 50 or 100 years ago, ought to be set aside in favour of the concern for civil liberty that this wedge-end-measure suggests will be the caes in more places in the future.
Who can say how long before it is used to prevent a “Fathers 4 Justice” father from getting his “kid” back from the State?