There is no reason why the USA should always be our friend

We should think sometimes.

See update below, and the MSM heat is, slowly but inevitably, building:-

David Davis

It is an independent federation of States which chooses (and does choose) to behave as an independent nation. We ought not to take its benignity in any form of alliance for granted. Remember who gave them the Statue of Liberty, and for what historical deed and attributes. The USA has never needed critically to be our friend, or indeed anyone’s friend!

(There are in fact interesting arguments in favour of its having been better for it to continue in utter isolation, as “A City upon a Hill”. Especially to defend against institutionally-European diseases and mortal risks such as GramscoFabiaNazism, in all its various vile guises. If the USA goes down to GFNs, and it does seem now to have its fair share, we are all in trouble. But this is the subject of another post later.)

Conveniently for us here, the USA chose to aid us in most of the 20th Century, in our manichaean struggles with sundry tyrannies, at critical times. In 1917 for example – even up to February, and even up to the Zimmermann Telegram –  it was an entirely neutral and almost uncoloured decision, for the USA, to side with one or other batch of belligerents. Or even not at all.

Whatever valuable points Sean Gabb makes or implies about the First World War, it was (1) probably unavoidable in the end, and (2) our underlying motives were just and noble. The sheer scale of waste and slaughter is another matter, as is the generality of libertarian opposition in principle to war.

What happened over Lockerbie, which accidentally happens to be in Scotland, affects the USA more if anything than the UK. What would, for example, have been the prosecution’s position against Megrahi et al , in either of these two cases? Firstly,  if the device had exploded, say, over Ribblehead or Slaidburn (if earlier it might have done – I am the Director of Northern Affairs: I know these places!) or secondly instead over international waters of the North Atlantic?

Here, I must add that it does not even matter a monkeys, whether it was the Gaddaffi-Megrahi mob wot dunn it, or another mob, most likely Syrian/Iranian, as the estimable Devil (pbuh) suggests here. If the Devil is right, then it’s the renaging on deals, of whatever sort (ask Stalin, he renaged on lots) that endanger them. And the initial results, always, are bad for liberty.

If public opinion in the USA leans towards refusing to buy our stuff (and they are I still think our major trading partner – the EU is nowhere by contrast) then that’s one more to chalk up to Gordon MaCavity, who seems to bugger off and go to ground when things get embarrassing. It’s becoming clearer by the hour that his pawprints (and most likely Mandelson’s, his puppet-master) are all over Megrahi and his release. But none of these three will be on the DNA database, you can bet the usual 17p.

Libertarians should hope that the sound good sense of the American People (it did however fail last November, for a critical minute) will prevail, and that little lasting damage will be done and this sleazy-dealy-oily-scumbag-under-the-carpet-while-nobody’s-looking event will sidle gently into oblivion. Libertarians in the UK and Europe will need all the help they can get in the next few decades – not just from US bloggers and think-tanks and philosophers, able to narrowcast to us and to each other – but from a broad front of general friendship and fellow-feeling for liberty – from an entire Nation.

And now this stuff is getting about:-

not useful to us, and embarrassing

not useful to us, and embarrassing

Look, guys: it’s all very well to strike postures – like about how Megrahi is not the right man, althoug he probably is. The Syrian and Iranian fascist guvmints were much much too clever, even in the late 1980s, to be seen with own their fingers in the blood if they could get somebody else to be the fall-guys. Also it’s just as heinous of Westminster to pretend to agree, by inference, and (worse) by silence, that it was a “Scottish Government decision”.

Libertarians are worried, because there are still a few hundred over this side of the Pond, and they want there to be somewhere they can disappear to more easily than Mexicans can, and in which there is enough space not to be found for decades, if not ever. Libertarians with British versions of EU passports are therefore endangered as regards their human rights to become refugees, by decisions like this one.

But I doubt it will.

0 thoughts on “There is no reason why the USA should always be our friend

  1. It is an independent federation of States which chooses (and does choose) to behave as an independent nation.

    This has not been true since the Civil War when the question of the right to secession (except perhaps in a few edge cases were the accession acts specify a right under limited circumstances) was removed using war.

    As for WWI – it was not for noble purposes, and it was the first salvo of the anti-liberal, corporate and war state in the US.
    The war was used to create the embryonic corporate state by introducing anti-competitive regulation to enable the cartelisation of US industry (something they failed to manage voluntarily, despite trying) and the incorporation of friendly unions into the corporate capitalist system as junior partners.
    It represented the first move away from anything close to a liberal economy and set the US up for further centralisation and FDR’s rule.

    In the UK, similar happened, and there was no desire to protect liberty, but instead to preserve British foreign and imperial interests for the ruling elite.
    If anything WWI was the final death throws of the feudal system and heralding the total transfer to the corporate state.

  2. It seems to me that most boundaries we take for granted are in some ways artificial and often constructed for our bemusement.
    Be they national boundries, apparent ideological boundaries, boundaries of good taste, boundaries of moral concern.
    Most of what we take for granted has been set up to our own confusion.
    Some in America are for freedom. Some are for control. It just depends who, at any given time, have more hands on more of the levers. Some in Europe favour truth, some deception and dishonour. Some rightists are for freedom and some for control. If a controlist can redefine a move for freedom as a move for rightists and then redefine rightists as favouring the police state. Well, he’s done his job.
    Only a love of truth with ensure survival.

  3. Americans seem to be forgetting that their government pressurised us Brits to release dozens of IRA terrorists a decade ago. Their threatened boycotts are hypocritical.

  4. I think that shitting all over our best legal traditions all across the Atlantic West simply because of no-doubt /anguished/ emotions is nonetheless the very best to way to slip, perhaps forever, back into the hysterical (and despotic!) sewer that IS the most of History.

  5. Pingback: Some Wookean Dog Days « Bodwyn Wook

  6. Pingback: We said it would happen « The Libertarian Alliance: BLOG

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s