The British Local Elections: Yawning over the Results

The British Local Elections:
Yawning over the Results
By Sean Gabb
(6th May 2016)

There were local elections yesterday across much of the United Kingdom – Scottish and Welsh parliaments, London Mayor and Assembly, and a sprinkling of English local authorities. Most of the results are not in yet, and I have no intention of looking at them very closely. They are in themselves a short term issue, interesting and important to a few obsessives and to anyone who hopes to make financial gain from whoever is now in. They are interesting and important to me only so far as they contribute to a longer term realignment of our politics.

Before 1940, there was a clear choice in politics. On the one side was the Conservative Party. This was committed to preserving whatever could be held of the traditional social and economic structure of the country. The landed interest was no longer dominant, but remained a strong part of the Tory coalition, and its interests were broadly congruent with those of the other possessing classes. Abroad, the Party was committed to preserving the Empire and British world power. These were not narrow-minded concerns. Traditionalism involved a defence of things like freedom of the press and due process of law and the general system of English liberty. It also involved a concern with the welfare of the poor. Whether protectionism was a good or bad policy is less important than the desire it showed to guarantee work at reasonable wages to the working classes. The Labour Party was not in practice that far removed from the Conservatives on foreign and Imperial policy. Its main difference was the belief in an economic reconstruction that made the welfare of the working classes the main criterion of policy. For the sake of balance, I will say that there was nothing ignoble about the old Labour project. It was mistaken in its means, and my personal inclinations would have made me a Conservative. But there is nothing wrong with a concern for raising up the poor.

Between 1940 and the present, these competing national visions have faded into slogans for bringing out at election time. Of course, there is no longer an Empire, and British world power has declined. But the Conservatives still like to sound like members of the traditional ruling class, and often are in genetic terms. The Labour Party still talks fondly about Clement Attlee. The reality is different. Both parties are committed to a neoconservative foreign policy dictated from Washington, and to domestic policies that are both authoritarian and corporatist. They are also equally committed to Bakanising and thereby abolishing the country as it has existed over time.

If Britain – or just England – is to survive and recover, both parties must be destroyed. The problem is that, since at least the 1970s, each has been living off fears of the other. By way of explanation, let me give my own personal experience. I voted Conservative in 1979 in youthful hope of a traditionalist reaction. With the Falklands victory still in mind, I was eager to vote Conservative again in 1983. By 1987, I voted Conservative with growing doubts. Since 1992, I have voted Conservative only to keep Labour out. When, in 2001 and 2005, the Conservatives had no reasonable chance of winning, I voted UKIP. But I voted Conservative in 2010 and in 2015. I would certainly have voted Conservative had yesterday’s elections been for Parliament. I have Labour friends whose personal history is similar. Both parties are unpopular with or reviled by many who vote for them. Each survives by making itself ever so slightly better, in the eyes of its electors, than the other.

To get rid of both parties, therefore, we need to lose either one of them. Lose one, and the other loses its only selling point. Peter Hitchens has long been convinced that the Conservatives should go first. Without giving my reasons. I disagree. In any event, the Conservatives are in Government, and are likely to stay there for a long time. At the moment, Labour is the weakest member of the duopoly.

Now to the elections. I was hoping Labour would do a great deal worse than it did. I am pleased that it did badly in Scotland. Because of traditionally weak support in England, it will need to do well in Scotland to win the next general election. A further benefit is that the loss of Scottish support to the nationalists reduces the number or influence in Westminster of some really malign authoritarians. I am less pleased by Labour’s showing in England. The party has not been entirely deserted by the white working classes, and it looks as if its collapse into a sectional party for state workers and non-whites will not happen in time for the next general election.

An encouraging sign is the present scandal over Labour’s anti-semitism. I do not for a moment believe that Jeremy Corbyn and Ken Livingstone are Hitler-worshipping anti-semites. Their hostility to Israel has nothing to do with a dislike of Jews, but is partly to firm up Islamic electoral support, and partly because they are instinctively outraged by the sight of an ethno-state willing to do whatever it takes to look after its own people. But it is a funny scandal to watch. These are the people who first began whining about racism in the 1970s, and who made rules wherever they could in the 1980s against mention of black bin bags and black coffee. To see them now opening their mouths with astonishment is rather like watching Robespierre dragged to the guillotine. I doubt if many non-whites will be put off voting Labour by accusations of anti-semitism. But the accusations sow useful dissension at a time when the party is already weak.

The ideal outcome at the next general election will be a Conservative landslide. What happens in Scotland is no longer important. The referendum on Europe is also unimportant. I doubt if we shall leave the European Union in the next ten years. When we do leave, it will be as part of a general scheme of reconstruction. What matters now is the destruction of the Labour Party. Give the Conservatives a majority of two hundred at the next election, and they will spend a few weeks running about like a dog with two tails. They will then start tearing themselves apart. Even otherwise, the path will have been cleared for the emergence of new parties committed to liberty and tradition.

Putting this analysis earlier today to one of my colleagues, I was reminded of Labour’s big victory in 1997. This shattered the Conservatives and kept them weak for a decade, yet the Labour Party did not implode. My answer to this point is that there was no credible socialist alternative to New Labour. Many Labour voters, and some politicians, may still have worshipped Arthur Scargill in 1997. But hardly anyone thought that kind of socialism was likely to work. Intellectual leftism has been a dying force since the 1980s. The universities and every institution connected with the State are dominated by people who call themselves leftists. These continue to do much harm, and will do more yet. This being said, they are increasingly no more than a social network – ruthless and without mercy or charity if you are not one of them. But they are an organised mediocrity. Though we can laugh at their obscurity, men like Althusser and Lukács had something to say. When they publish, their successors are just going through the motions. They have nothing to say that convinces anyone with half a brain. After 1997, New Labour was The Left.

The right, on the other hand – however you want to define that – is increasingly vibrant. It may be split into dozens of factions, not all of them on speaking terms with each other. But it is a live intellectual force. Look behind the red dwarf that is Conservative Central Office, and the clamour of rightist intellectuals is only kept out of the mainstream media by the current generation of scared apparatchiks who continue to dominate our national life.

And so yesterday’s results look promising. Once you look below the surface, nothing happens quickly in politics. But something does appear to be stirring, and may have been stirring for some time.

Now, let me say in closing, for the avoidance of doubt, that the Libertarian Alliance is a charity. We do not involve ourselves in party politics. We made no recommendations of how to vote in yesterday’s elections, and we make none for any election in the future. This article and others like it must be taken purely as intellectual commentary in pursuit of our charitable objectives.



  • Hitchens’ strategy makes more sense for us since we are in a position to speed up the destruction of the Conservative Party. What influence do we have on the Labour Party?

  • Why write at all when you must know hope is helpless?

    Wales and Scotland mean nothing to me anymore. Of course I don’t blame them for wishing to break free of the Westminster crowd but the union itself was worth saving. With this latest surge of Nationalism showing however it’s only a matter of time before they realise what it was they threw away.

    UKIP is the new broom in the cupboard but no one in the party is willing to get dirty. Certainly not Nigel. When the penny drops he’ll quit and quietly walk away. He’s a poor leader anyway so no big loss. He can talk well enough. He’s also confused about racism. It’s very important not to become confused – especially when sign posts leading home have been removed.

    To a certain extent Donald Trump is doing for the States what needs to be done here. Sometimes however a new broom brushes the cracks so well the bugs lurking below can be seen. Obama will be leaving millions of bugs. It’s what’s done with them when he leaves that really matters.

    I think Trump can do what is needed. I hope so. My investments are relying on him.

    Several months ago I made a bet with a friend concerning Trump’s nomination chances. I laid odds that Donald would win the nomination. My friend took the bet and laughed hard. Last year Trump was spinning his wheels – being attacked and ridiculed from every quarter. ‘No way’, they said, ‘He’s going nowhere’. My friend stopped laughing earlier this week.

    It’s to be hoped that Donald Trump understands the serious danger he’s placed himself in. I think he probably does.

    The only truly important news today is that Islam claimed another victory. Just like rampant illegal immigration though no one chooses to talk about – let alone write down what they truly feel. Don’t blame you of course, these days the knock on the door can come at any time.

    The silence you’re hearing now is the same silence you’ll hear when some electorate or other eventually decide that Islam is the way to go. It’s inevitable. Don’t kid yourselves otherwise.

    The conservatives are the way to go… Seriously! Perhaps yes but for how long will they keep going? So very, very pleased that I no longer have tiny children to worry about. I wouldn’t want to try explaining to them what went so rapidly, horribly, tragically wrong.

  • These elections, like most others, are a massive irrelevance. I didn’t vote, why bother when whoever we ‘elect’ the same people still get in to power? However, if I lived in London I would have voted for Paul Golding. One of the few people on display yesterday with any honesty and courage.

    ” It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”

    • “For this House, lacking the necessary authority either out-of-doors or indoors, legislatively to give away the independence and sovereignty of the House now and for the future, is an unthinkable act. The very stones of this place would cry out against us if we dared such a thing.” (Same chap CG.)

      But they did dare such a thing and the stones have cried out. At this very moment their neglect is being mollified by masons. Not hopeless politicians but the type of man that all men rightly admire. The sort that build up with skill, strength and energy. Not the weakling scum who preach before tearing down.

      Look – even Westminster’s walls no longer wish to shelter the occupants from the gathering storm! Bind them all I say. Cast them into the Thames. The already blind will not be in need of folds.

      Seriously I weep for fools. You know folks, only fools make the same mistakes over and over. To keep voting Tory, is not simply being irresponsible it’s being naive and foolish. When a pilot thinks he might have to crash land his aircraft he searches for the safest place possible. That way he gives himself options and a chance to survive.

  • One definition of insanity, John, is to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Not only would I apply that to those who keep voting Tory, but I would apply it equally to anyone who votes for any of the main parties. They are all bought and paid for, and, whatever they say when they grovel for our votes, their actions are predictable. They are predictable because they are predetermined by those who own and control them, and whose agenda is as clear as day. An agenda which ultimately does not include making anyone’s life better – except their own and those like them.

  • I don’t even bother voting now and haven’t for many years.

  • Meyer's Fusionist

    For those who are sceptical about voting, in Wales, we saw quite a shift in Assembly politics where UKIP gained 7 seats at the cost of all the others losing theirs (apart from the vile Plaid Cymru who gained one seat).

    It goes to show that under the Proportional Representation system, you really do get the party you want representing you and in my case, that is exactly what happened.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s