Are Liberal Pervs Sexually Obsessed With Refugees?


By ilana mercer

It’s hard to feel sorry for liberals when they reap the results of the policies they force on the rest of us.

A middle-aged woman, who campaigned against the deportation of migrants from her native Sweden, was raped by the very refugees she advocates for.

She met two Afghani teens on the street, outside a bar—no slut-shaming, please—voluntarily accompanied them to their taxpayer-funded pad. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Behind the European obsession with importing tall, dark, Middle-Eastern young men are hordes of horny, menopausal, Social Justice Warriors (SJW).

“Bohemian witches” or “tie-dye hags” is how one risqué, Swedish, YouTube commentator calls this degenerate distaff.

Left-liberal women (like Chancellor Angela Merkel) certainly have a fixation—could it be erotic?—with rescuing dark, handsome, exotic-looking strangers.

Judging from their irrational, histrionic protests against President Trump’s travel ban, we appear destined to live or die by these females’ hormones (or their replaced hormones).

Some men in that part of the world are not much better.

A Norwegian male was raped by a Somali asylum seeker. The last term—Somali asylum seeker—is something of a contradiction like the first (Norwegian man).

The asylum-seeker honorific is given to practically anyone from the Dark Continent or the Middle-East who washes up on Continental Europe’s shores.

The politician, Karsten Nordal Hauken, who says he’s heterosexual, went public with the details of his awful ordeal. “I was raped by a Somalian asylum seeker,” he wrote in a Norwegian newspaper. “My life fell into ruin.”

But it was Nordal Hauken, not his assailant, who proceeded to assault sensibilities with a confession that rivals the crime for reprehensibility. Hyperbole? I don’t think so.

As Hauken, a self-described left-wing feminist, tells it, he has been wracked by guilt because one night of passion had caused his Somali assailant to be returned to sender.

After resting up in a Norwegian prison, the rapist is said to have been deported to Somalia. (I can find no evidence of said rapist’s whereabouts. Maybe he’s en route to America?)

Hauken laments being overcome by “a strong feeling of guilt and responsibility. I was the reason that he would not be in Norway anymore …”

And: “I see [the Somali] mostly as a product of an unfair world, a product of an upbringing marked by war and despair.”

In his perversity, our leftist political powerbroker further mischaracterized the light sentence given to his rapist by the Norwegian State as “the ultimate revenge,” meted out by “an angry father confronting it’s [sic] child’s attacker.”

Mr. Hauken also moans that the rapist, we’ll call him Mr. Priapus, would be “sent to a dark uncertain future in Somalia,” instead of enjoying, presumably, the bright future that awaits a man with his priapic proclivities in welcoming Norway.

Hauken has since come to the conclusion that he might not have been raped after all, but simply subjected to “a cultural difference.”

What a penetrating observation!

A somewhat shallow analysis of this sorry specter was offered up in the British Spectator. It chalks up Hauken’s confession to a simple case of “Stockholm syndrome,’ used to describe hostages who take on the perspectives of their kidnappers.”

“Perhaps the Hauken case,” opines The Spectator’s Douglas Murray, “could be used to coin the term ‘Norway syndrome,’ an affliction that causes rape-victims to feel concern over the prospects of their rapists?”

Tellingly, Mr. Murray collapses the distinction between the reaction of this male heterosexual and that of another rape victim: “a ‘no-borders’ activist on the French-Italian border.”

She “was gang-raped by a group of Sudanese immigrants but was persuaded to keep quiet about her own rape, in case it was used to undermine the open-borders cause.”

The woman is another fool who reaped the results of her folly. As far as we know, however, the raped woman has never publicly expressed a kinship with her gang rapists and is said to have been coaxed into silence.

Good or bad, the Norwegian Nordal Hauken has spoken openly about a reality few straight men would reveal: rape by another man. Hauken, not the female vanquished by the invaders, is the one said to feel for his violator. So far, Hauken has certainly shared his inappropriate feelings more promiscuously than most women would.

Indeed, the liberal program aims to dissolve “the constitution of man” in the service of sexual sameness. It is predicated on the imbecilic belief that biology is incidental, and that men and women are essentially interchangeable.

Egalitarianism, the goal of the Left and the Political Right, rests on the blunting of male-female differences. In the service of egalitarian sameness, the man-vs.-female biological imperatives are rapidly, if reflexively, being dissolved.

Survival, however, has a biological dimension. A submissive, effete civilization, made up of men like Mr. Hauken will not endure.

The repulsive specter of Karsten Nordal Hauken just about turning the other cheek to the man who spread both his cheeks is not an isolated case.

The pale, liberal patriarchy is a pioneer in forever scrutinizing itself for signs of racism and deficits in empathy toward “The Other,” while readily accusing others of the same.

It’s as though liberal men derive erotic pleasure from prostrating themselves to assailants and ceding to racial claims-making.

Could it be that liberal men are driven by a powerful homo-erotic impulsive?

Who knows, but as the example of Nordal Hauken shows, this specimen is queering at a rapid pace.

 

Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian column since 1999. She is the author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & “The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Facebook, Gab & YouTube

Advertisements

10 comments

  • “They’re bringing crime, they’re rapists, and some of them, I assume, are good people.”
    Haha but seriously what’s with these liberal clowns?

  • The fact that these ‘asylum-seekers’ are predominantly young men is presumably not worthy of comment?
    “A submissive, effete civilization, made up of men like Mr. Hauken will not endure.” I have always assumed that is part of the plan?

  • IS ‘ILANA MERCER’ A ‘SEXUAL DEVIANT’?

    The woman in Sweden whom Ms Mercer refers to in this article wasn’t ‘raped by the very refugees she campaigned for’.

    She was raped by ‘two Afghani men’. I don’t know if they were refugees. It doesn’t matter whether they were or not.

    I support UK Sovereignty But that doesn’t mean that if an EU Leave voter rapes me, I’ve been ‘raped by the very people I campaigned for’.

    Ms Mercer and Mr Hauken appear to deserve one another.

    In any case, concern over the prospects for someone who does you wrong, is a Christian virtue which we are taught in the New Testament.

    Mr Hauken might be unwittingly condoning crime, or even mad, but his virtues are not to be condemned. He’s closer to a sense of morality than Ms Mercer is.

    The ‘French Italian Border’ woman might have been silly in not reporting the crime she suffered. But isn’t that up to her?

    She was the victim. She is not a ‘possession of the State’ who, for the protection of others, is obliged to report things personal to her, and then go on to participate in a distressing State promoted circus of a court trial.

    Neither did she, as Mercer claims ‘reap any reward’ for her folly. She was raped before she covered it up.

    ‘Libertarianism’ does not rest on ‘the blunting of male-female differences’. Christians and Libertarians recognise that we are not defined by our gender, race and sexuality, but by who we are, as individuals.

    I wonder whether all this sado masochistic paranoia to an environment where few of the rest of us would have suspected its’ presence in an indication that Ms Mercer is, herself, is a sexual deviant.

    But perhaps that’s just Africans for you.

    Just in case, let’s make sure that Ms Mercer’s never allowed into the UK. Perhaps, as precaution, she should also be deported from the US.

    If she is, might also consider taking with her, all the migrants and political and religious refugees who are descendants of the migrants and refugees who’ve arrived there in the past 500 years.

    She might even consider taking the ‘Native Americans’ back to Africa, from whence they, also came, following the start of the migration out of Africa tens of thousands of years before Ms Mercer migrated out of Africa herself.

    • Case in point.

      • “Behind the European obsession with importing tall, dark, Middle-Eastern young men are hordes of horny, menopausal, Social Justice Warriors (SJW).”

        Worse yet, they actually tend to be quite short and small on average.

        As for Norwegians, as I’ve said before, they’re not nearly as bad as Swedes. Norway has reversed its migration policy faster than any other Scandinavian nation, or any other European nation.

        https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/723077/Norway-EU-borders-remain-closed-migrant-crackdown

        Still, any country in the moronic “open borders” Schengen zone, faces the risk of some other country growing fed up of the hordes of “refugees” and basically economic tourists, being granted EU passports, and offloading them elsewhere in the EU. As Germany’s example shows, not even 1% of them go on to get jobs.

    • “She might even consider taking the ‘Native Americans’ back to Africa, from whence they, also came, following the start of the migration out of Africa tens of thousands of years before Ms Mercer migrated out of Africa herself.”

      Stupid non-argument. There has been significant divergence in human groups in those 10,000 years you speak of. Try not to play stupid and pretend recent migratory influxes are equivalent to movements 10,000 years ago. It just makes you look like one of those fetishists Ms Mercer writes of.

  • Pingback: Are Liberal Pervs Sexually Obsessed With Refugees? | The Ludwig von Mises Centre – Truth Darts

  • Red Indians (or ‘Native Americans’ as we are told to call them today for fear of being denounced as ‘racist’) aren’t Africans – they’re Japs!
    Of course migration is nothing new – what IS new is the concerted political attempt we are now witnessing to flood the West with as many aggressive disaffected young men from alien cultures as possible, with the obvious if unstated aim of destabilising our society and destroying it if possible.
    Meanwhile, immigrants who have over many years made a positive contribution to our society are now faced with deportation.

  • In fact, I think the REAL ‘Native Americans’ are French. They bloody got there first! There’s a tribe up by the Great Lakes called the Huron-Wendat I believe. Their ancestors came from France even before the Japs crossed the Bering Strait!

  • 1) “IS ‘ILANA MERCER’ A ‘SEXUAL DEVIANT’?
    The woman in Sweden whom Ms Mercer refers to in this article wasn’t ‘raped by the very refugees she campaigned for’.
    She was raped by ‘two Afghani men’. I don’t know if they were refugees. It doesn’t matter whether they were or not.”
    I think it does matter. Anecdotal evidence – and the public record – suggests that immigrants of this ilk do seem to make a habit of raping and molesting their hosts. If this is so, we should take note of it and act accordingly. I believe the rape ‘victim’ in this case did indeed support immigration of this nature. You may be correct in that she did not campaign specifically for the individuals who attacked her, but the general principle remains true.

    2) “I support UK Sovereignty But that doesn’t mean that if an EU Leave voter rapes me, I’ve been ‘raped by the very people I campaigned for’.”
    Quite correct – you will have been raped by the very people you campaigned alongside. A wholly different analogy.

    3) “Ms Mercer and Mr Hauken appear to deserve one another.
    In any case, concern over the prospects for someone who does you wrong, is a Christian virtue which we are taught in the New Testament”.
    I believe Ms Mercer is Jewish – ‘An eye for an eye’ rather than ‘turn the other cheek’, perhaps. “Concern over the prospects for [sic] someone who does you wrong” is one thing; vicarious guilt is something else.

    4) “I wonder whether all this sado masochistic paranoia to an environment where few of the rest of us would have suspected its’ presence in an indication that Ms Mercer is, herself, is a sexual deviant.”
    I wish I understood what you meant!

    5) “Just in case, let’s make sure that Ms Mercer’s never allowed into the UK. Perhaps, as precaution, she should also be deported from the US.”
    In case of what, pray?

    6) Subtle point perhaps, but I believe Ms Mercer hails from South Africa rather than Africa. Just in case anyone should get the wrong idea;)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s