Tag Archives: diet

More experts say stuff


Michael Winning

And to continue the Boss’s Day Of Small Things, I know it’s late but It says over at the Daily Express that “salt kills 40,000 people a year.”

Experts say this so it must be true.

Well I suppose we all have to die of something so it might as well taste nice. It puts the term food-fascism in a new light, and so why don’t we just send all these experts to a state-health-farm, in the far north somewhere, with nothing but boiled root vegetables to eat, that’ll fix them.

Personally I recommend tiny little wet-finger-touch-helpings of sodium monohydrogen-glutamate, as a hor-douevre. It actually tastes quite good. You can buy 500g and 1Kg shrink-packs of it at the local Chinese cash and carry in Manchester.

Scurvy scumbags


David Davis

I meant Derbyshire County Council Soviet. I thought all County Soviets are now Tory, are they not? WTF are these scumbag social workers doing still in employment then? All those evil departments should have been put on the street with binliners, and theirdepartmental hard disks and Servers malleted, straight after the first Tory win.

And aren’t we all hectored that “junk food” is bad, specially for the cheeeeldren?

So children have become State Property.

It is encouraging to see that real people still like things like this


David Davis

I give you “The Craz-E”….

Kill an Obesity-Nazi, and win a Metro

Kill an Obesity-Nazi, and win a Metro

If we had really been properly awake over the last 40-odd years, then the monstrously self-regarding and wicked diet-hubris of the Enemy Classes, towards those classes of people they instinctively shrink from, and have for all eternity despised and feared, such as those who live in poverty, and the fat, and the smokers, could have been nipped in the bud.

For example: we had everything on our side: the Green Revolution was in full swing and on the side of people, and aginst hunger, starvation and socialist methods of United-Nations-managed-mass death, such as famines and “disasters”….and “terribly-bitterly-cold Upper-Jipoopooland Winters” (usually in hot places like Afghanistan.) We could have had the UN closed down in 1964 and nobody who then mattered would have noticed!

Sex on film and in public had only just been invented, and Kenneth Tynan had only just finished saying F*** on live Wireless Tele Vision, and getting lambasted for it – we could have had the media to ourselves! Just think of the fun – “BIG BRAINBOX”, a reality-TV show in which extremely clever and well-regarded libertarian-philosophy-student-wannabe-professors are marooned in a “house” for weeks, debating and disputing points of epistemology, and you have to vote out the least anti-Gramscian one each day! Their average age is about 19, they have no bodypiercings or tattoos, they’re all up at Corpus or St John’s, and they know everything….

As Frenkie Howerd would have said….”Twitter-ye not!”

Then again, the Universities were still happily small in number – and still contained people who taught only truth:  “environmental sciences, “sports-psychology-with-criminology-and-health-club-management” and “health and social care”, had not yet been even tentatively wheeled out. We could have shot all the young wierdy-beardy GramscoMarxists who’d been parachuted into the Teacher Training Colls, and still nobody’d have noticed!

We could have even shot them behind the bike-sheds, and put their bodies into the dump-bins, or whetever we had in those days. The “dustmen” could have even taken them away.

We lost our chance to kill, char-grill and eat these bloody murdering people, while they were yet few in number, timid, and relatively undangerous. Our last chance for a certain, swift and clean ideological victory probably vanished, either with the Bandung Conference, or the first Club of Rome meeting.

We lost our chance to save the world in return for practically no spent money and time, in about 1960. Or perhaps 1944: worse and less forgiveable. Chris Tame and Sean Gabb were born thirty years too late. We will have to work harder now, like Stakhanov.

EAT  A  BIG  MAC, WITH THANKS FOR Cartwright, Watt, Arkwright and Faraday, and Norman Borlaug too, AND  ENRAGE  POLLY  TOYNBEE and George Monbiot,  TODAY.

Then, chargrill them and eat them, later, when we are on our uppers due to their efforts.

Simon Heffer for Prime Minister


He’s not sound on drugs, but at least he gets what Parliament is for.

David Davis

I have little time to write anything else today: perhaps you others can do somethng.

The above title alone should be enough to get Tony’s goat up. I bet you all 17p Tony’s got some paleogeological gripe about Heffer (probably supported waterboarding in the Glorious revolution of 1688 or something, and the “evidence” was posthunously covered up be Sir Francis Walsingham and Robert Cecil – http://www.agentsfor1688truth.org … ) – he seems to have one about every other individual to whom I make even a tangentially-euphemistic reference!

UPDATE1:- Heffer is still “considering” standing against the gardening heffalump. Good thing too: put the wind up the shysters it will, since we need to “send a massage” that we have allowed too many of the wrong sort of people into the Houses of Parliament, while our back was turned to deal with other matters – and we need more non-careerist-charity-shop-type-old-ladies (to whom £65,000-odd with no “extras” would feel like riches), retired-Field-Marshalls-who-don’t-need-the-money, successful ex-tobacconists-who-have-risen-to-run-multiple-chains (and who don’t need the money) and the like.

Iain Dale, who ought to know better on this one, and who is too close to the current Political Class for my liking (he may catch an infection if he’s not careful) had a go at Heffer a few hours ago. Who cares? If Heffer starts a trend, there can be plenty of local people in the constituencies of others. Like Hoon, Darling, Kirkbride, Mackay, and any other scumbag grifters and graspers who refuse to fall on their swords (as they can’t afford to yet, for there may be as much as £150,000 still to be troughed before June 2010.)

I am afraid Iain has misjudged the mood: he is too close to those who still plan to gain, even a little bit, while they can. keep away from them, Iain: we will need your powerful voice to rip the pants off the next lot of mountebanks, who will also be no better than they ought to be, and will if we are not careful, become what they are.

Libertarian Alliance Blast-from-the-Past, No:1 … More on metrication, the EU, and British home-grown fascists


David Davis

(I originally wrote this on 18th October 2008. But some of the points raised deserve a new airing in the light of recent events in Parliament and how these relate to fascism and the Enemy-Class-Hatred of all things moral and English.)

Earlier today I just flagged this up. I now have time to say something. (The original post is not only lower down your page but also here.)

The EU, with its usual disarming frankness about objectives, has gone on record as saying that it’s not really important if people here (or by inference elsewhere) go on using pre-metric, which is to say “Imperial” measurements. For one thing of course, these are still commonly encountered in all sorts of places on the continent of Europe.

The real subtext of the assault on “Imperial” measurement use in the UK is of course, and always has been, ideological and manichean. It is obvious, now that we know the facts. Those kinds of people who so publicly have championed “metrication” (and that also included the quite un-necessary and politically-motivated “decimalisation” of our currency) share a fully philosophical objective: what is this objective, then?

It is the exemplary punishment of Britain: especially, it encompasses an objective of the destruction of a place which they view as “England” – together with all its customs and traditions which act as a sort of conservative glue. The whole idea of “England”, historically, is essentially conservative. England’s history returns almost like clockwork, to a theme of looking to tradition and custom (as understood at the time of decision about the future) to decide what to do. This is mortally dangerous to gangsters like Lenin, Marx, Stalin, Hitler, Gordon Brown, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il (who will continue to remain dead), Huggy the Chav, Ken Livingstone, Castro (who has been dead for some time) and whoever that bugger was who ran the Sendero Luminoso (I hope there won’t be a pop group called that any time soon.)

This stuff, this conservative glue, hard to create over the centuries, but easy to abolish with a Gestapo-sweep of A4 paper containing “enhanced statutory requirements”, holds a free people in friendships and relationships in a comfortable place, and confers order on civilisation. This of course is quite inimical to the fascist/stalinist concept of “more and faster change”, beloved of “management” “consultants”, or one of the other ones, which is “best practice in health and safety”.

Most importantly, it is because an essentially conservative civilisation is all that stands in the way of the intended destruction of what helps ordinary people to live and get better and better as time advances – that destruction which is crucial for the survival of wreckers, murderers, fascists, socialists and other theoretical idealists who have never inhabited anything more important (such as a factory or a mine or a ploughed field) than a room at a university. These latter groups know, with every fibre of their being, that their usefulness and significance diminishes visibly and fast, with the arrival of every person who can make his own way and decisions in his life.

You can’t, if you are a statist, allow people essentially to better themselves and their lives…and then you just go home and grow stuff or watch TV. The hog won’t slaughter itself.

There will come a time when they won’t need you or your “help”, and they will be able to know it. If they are armed, then you are toast already (so you’d better have got their guns off them quite early on.) If they are unarmed, then you will still have a difficult time, and you may have to shoot the right people (they didn’t in this case), but you may get through if you can manufacture a scare or two, preferably together, and hobble them further.

I think that British statists, being cleverer and more (what Stalin called) “serious” than continental ones (their weather is better and the food and girls are nicer, so they don’t really have to concentrate so hard) are far, far more finely-tuned to the threat of incipient liberty arising in a population, than their European conterparts.

I shudder to think with what ruthless efficiency the Police authorities in the UK would have complied with Nazi orders to round up people and have them “resettled”. Anti-Imperial-measure-police-and-Soviet-staff are merely taking a “directive” at its face value, and applying it to the letter, together with their own ingrained (ought I to say “institutionalised”?) racism against a civilisation which they (rightly) see as the one which has done most to try to make them as redundant as possible.

« Older Entries