I know we don’t have the death penalty for nonces, but it makes you wonder how prisoners in prison get to have razor-blades to use against other prisoners


EDIT: the Maily Dail has it as “breaking news” – that tells you everything about our civilisation. And I wrote it fully 30 minutes ago… and I’m slow and old.

David Davis

This is the first of my long-headline-pieces for some time.

Someone called Ian Huntley, who killed two girls in 2002 in the benighted place called Soham, where I wonder how anyone can ever sell a house these days, got his throat slashed, actually while _/in prison/_

I thought that the death penalty for “capital crimes” had been abolished in 1968. And it seems that this was by the very people who engineered laws of various kinds that criminalised people, increasingly stringently over the recent years, who were thought to think about girls, and sex, and stuff like that, like Ian Huntley apparently is thought to think.

These people are called Fabians. I am not saying that Fabians are the only people that think that strange men should not murder little girls for any reason whatsoever. The murder of little girls is wrong, and libertarians are against this.

Well, there you are. The effing nonce killer has been attacked, with intent, while in prison. Could someone please tell me how prisoners get blades of sharpness, and what for?

I wonder whether this British-State, although having officially abolished the death penalty 42 years ago, has privately decided that this specific penalty _/can/_ be applied, and perhaps should be applied, sometimes, in an “accidental” sort of unsupervised way, but only to criminals which it has decided that nobody will bitch about the death of, and who are already “inside”.

By other criminals, so nobody who matters gets blamed for stuff “going through the wrong channels”?

It’s just nasty buggers killing each other, in a “sort of criminals’ hierarchy”.

How barbaric is that, then?

I thought we were in favour of the “Rule of Law”?

No?

I am not in favour of a “State Death Penalty”. It transfers the obligation to end the life of another human to the State’s decision, which we cannot do and which we cannot delegate since we are currently not allowed that individual right. If we cannot delegate this right, not possessing it supposedly, then we cannot allow the State to allow other prisoners of it to end the life of Ian Huntley.

If we as sovereign individuals are allowed the right to end the life of those that torment and oppress us, then we can kill others, and so someone else who is aggrieved by him can kill Ian Huntley – but NOT the other prisoners. He is not their problem, and they are not his. IF he is to be kept alive by statute law, then he ought to be kept away from scumbag murderers and robbers who’d kill for a half-penny, and who think that they hate “pediatricians”.

Only the parents and relations of the girls he killed could have any traction in this one.

Girls have clearly moved on


David Davis

Many decades ago, my father – a scientist – described to me as a small boy a kind of injury out of pure scientific interest, caused by a stiletto heel making a self-shaped depressed-skull-fracture. It was like a trepanning-wound only small and D-shaped.The injuree was invariably male, in the 1950s and 1950s.

It was called “somebody-or-other’s syndrome” (I can’t google it sadly) named after the usual obscure central-European-Physician who first described it. Not Kleinfelter’s, nor Münschausen’s, but something like that.

Clearly, today’s new-labour girls, fired up by GramscoFemiNaZism and enragement that “models” and “WAGs” have invaded their “partners’ ” text-messaging, have moved on. This poor man had his entire eye taken out, and the fracture-zone passed into his brain.

Stiletto heels are good. At least, on short-girls, which is the right sort to be, they are.

They make the female stance and walk more exciting to watch, which is their primary courting purpose, and also they bring her secondary sexual characteristics up nearer to yours when you have got her in a hug. This is the next most important objective, and ideally leaves her still shorter still than you, which is necessary or else you would need to stand on a box, which means that your name is Bernie Ecclestone (and that would not be good.)

If she injured him in a taxi, then although we do not know the circumstances, I suggest one of the following:-

(1) He is “NSIT” *** which means he made a pass privately in the taxi, was rejected, and was rejected utterly and suddenly (unlikely that she would react so violently)

(2) She discovered he’d given his phone to a mate who sent pictures of him (taken earlier) to a call-girl, while pretending the pics were of the sender (possible these days)

(3) She read his credit-card-statements and decided to injure him about the massage-parlour-stuff on the way home after a date (likely)

(4) She was annoyed that he’d posted pics of himself on Facebook, with a former girlfriend on holiday in Ibiza the year before (very probable in today’s climate of opinion)

(5) She was annoyed that he’d not glassed-up a dude who looked at her in the pub (also sadly probable).

*** “not safe in taxis”

Tiger Woods, wives, girls, encounters, and sex


David Davis

The problem with “Tiger” (is that REALLY his name? No I don’t think he was Christened “Tiger”) Woods is that he’s famous, and he plays a sport that GramscoFabiaNazis, the wretched and tormented social climbers that they all are, are desperate to get into for its conferred layer of respectabililty. Golf. So – I wouldn’t go for it frankly if you paid me, just like the sport of smoking, but that’s just me. Down the road from me, there is a Golf Club, at which the “Open” was played a year or so ago, and into which no possibly imaginable amount of money or fame could get you…unless you were “all right”, or you “know John Ball“. (NB! NOT “John Galt!”) Mr Barnaby and Midsomer Murders are not even in the league.

A globally-famous, ethnic (a really strong bonus) and astonishingly rich man is going to be the target of gold-diggers. Obama can’t yet be targetted behind his CIA/Halliburton/Bush/Rothschild/capitalism/Pentagon/Jewish-conspiracy/anti-Copenhagen/paywall, but Woods can be for he is private and unprotected. The purpose of the Hominid Y-chromosome is to replicate as many simultaneous copies of itself in living bodies in real-time as it can. That’s what it does, that’s its job. Poor thing: it does NOT belong in our celebratory-multicultural-post-feminist-century – perhaps now we will go extinct and please Paul Ehrlich at last… Therefore someone like Woods is vulnerable to people who want other people to believe that they have had sex with him.

I’m only surprised that, Woods being as rich as he is and as successful as he has been, for as long as he has been, that it’s taken so long to do the Aztec-Human-Sacrifice-Routine-Tart-in-the-night-at-hotel-Thingy on him.

I wonder to myself in the night, while dreaming, what Libertarians would do about celebrities and the media. Is either necessary, or both? If one or the other or neither, what then ought we to do? All these people and their private tragedies are such a distraction from the real issues, such as what to do about Gordon Brown and the other Fabians.

…And…for the ScumbaGramciaNazi Grand Challenge Cup (all comers) we have this…


David Davis

He claimed £5 for money he put in a Church Collection. Has to be Labour of course. Even the Tories would not do that.

Frank Cook. Hmmmm. Does not think people should have guns…unsound a priori.

This is a sort of roundup

…I wonder what other countries think of us these days.

But it will get lost, in the media-furore against the Tory claimers….true that their claims have been bizarre and astonishingly ill-judged against the possibility that they might all come out, but I think the general principle holds still, that GramscoMarxiaNazis still have their hands more firmly rooted inside the back recesses of the till than Tories do, or have done. Tory MP-scammism was, rightly and originally, about getting lovely sex with younger women, who posed as “parliamentary secretaries”, since young Tories all wore pinstriped suits, Bengal Shirts and silk ties all the time, and were estate agents and could not therefore pull girls. But in default of being able to do that, what was needed could be called in anyway just over the phone if you were an MP: I don’t know why they could not have stuck to the model (in a manner of speaking.)

No averagely-pretty young woman would, I feel sure, agree to be shagged by a socialist in any case, and assuredly not even for ready money or expenses. the current appearance of “Blair Babes” corroborates this hypothesis.

I can’t think people like Keeley Hazell and all her clones would be so base.