Tiger Woods, wives, girls, encounters, and sex

David Davis

The problem with “Tiger” (is that REALLY his name? No I don’t think he was Christened “Tiger”) Woods is that he’s famous, and he plays a sport that GramscoFabiaNazis, the wretched and tormented social climbers that they all are, are desperate to get into for its conferred layer of respectabililty. Golf. So – I wouldn’t go for it frankly if you paid me, just like the sport of smoking, but that’s just me. Down the road from me, there is a Golf Club, at which the “Open” was played a year or so ago, and into which no possibly imaginable amount of money or fame could get you…unless you were “all right”, or you “know John Ball“. (NB! NOT “John Galt!”) Mr Barnaby and Midsomer Murders are not even in the league.

A globally-famous, ethnic (a really strong bonus) and astonishingly rich man is going to be the target of gold-diggers. Obama can’t yet be targetted behind his CIA/Halliburton/Bush/Rothschild/capitalism/Pentagon/Jewish-conspiracy/anti-Copenhagen/paywall, but Woods can be for he is private and unprotected. The purpose of the Hominid Y-chromosome is to replicate as many simultaneous copies of itself in living bodies in real-time as it can. That’s what it does, that’s its job. Poor thing: it does NOT belong in our celebratory-multicultural-post-feminist-century – perhaps now we will go extinct and please Paul Ehrlich at last… Therefore someone like Woods is vulnerable to people who want other people to believe that they have had sex with him.

I’m only surprised that, Woods being as rich as he is and as successful as he has been, for as long as he has been, that it’s taken so long to do the Aztec-Human-Sacrifice-Routine-Tart-in-the-night-at-hotel-Thingy on him.

I wonder to myself in the night, while dreaming, what Libertarians would do about celebrities and the media. Is either necessary, or both? If one or the other or neither, what then ought we to do? All these people and their private tragedies are such a distraction from the real issues, such as what to do about Gordon Brown and the other Fabians.

GOLF: It’s the “British Open”, at the Royal Birkdale

David Davis

ITEM: I’ve just been castigated by the same chum (mentioned below) for calling it the “British Open”. it’s the “Open Championship”, and then if you beat everyone, it is indeed a bonus because you get £750,000, and it’s all yours. No team mates as in “Foot Ball” (see “Foot Ball”  wikilink below, if you don’t know what that stuff is.)

Traffic chaos in town, espec round the Royal Birkdale, where the Open is going on now. Even so, parts of it looked very exciting on the Wireless Tele Vision. (The Golf, that is: not the traffic…)

Golf, although I can’t begin even to know how to play it, seems to me a more libertarian game than “Foot Ball“. None of this “team” stuff and all that collectivist nonsense, to worry about. You just try to play better and better, and if you beat somebody else, it’s a bonus.

It is to be hoped that all our local traders will take the opportunity to make plenty of money.

Oh, and the British Police will just have to go. One made an issue of my waiting (with engine on and flasher lights going) at a pre-arranged rendezvous in Gainsborough Road to pick up my old friend, a golf fanatic, and fined me £30 (about $60 USD.) His Gestapo chum, at the junction, had let me drive down there 3 minutes before. I had the purpose of plastic yellow cones explained to me, in public, in front of 20,000 exiting visitors.

If the Police in the UK have nothing better to do than to issue parking tickets to non-criminals, then they really have served out their usefulness. I think that a “Libertarian administration” – if that is not tautological – would find better things to do with policemen, or maybe it would contract out Law & Order to real householders.