I know we don’t have the death penalty for nonces, but it makes you wonder how prisoners in prison get to have razor-blades to use against other prisoners


EDIT: the Maily Dail has it as “breaking news” – that tells you everything about our civilisation. And I wrote it fully 30 minutes ago… and I’m slow and old.

David Davis

This is the first of my long-headline-pieces for some time.

Someone called Ian Huntley, who killed two girls in 2002 in the benighted place called Soham, where I wonder how anyone can ever sell a house these days, got his throat slashed, actually while _/in prison/_

I thought that the death penalty for “capital crimes” had been abolished in 1968. And it seems that this was by the very people who engineered laws of various kinds that criminalised people, increasingly stringently over the recent years, who were thought to think about girls, and sex, and stuff like that, like Ian Huntley apparently is thought to think.

These people are called Fabians. I am not saying that Fabians are the only people that think that strange men should not murder little girls for any reason whatsoever. The murder of little girls is wrong, and libertarians are against this.

Well, there you are. The effing nonce killer has been attacked, with intent, while in prison. Could someone please tell me how prisoners get blades of sharpness, and what for?

I wonder whether this British-State, although having officially abolished the death penalty 42 years ago, has privately decided that this specific penalty _/can/_ be applied, and perhaps should be applied, sometimes, in an “accidental” sort of unsupervised way, but only to criminals which it has decided that nobody will bitch about the death of, and who are already “inside”.

By other criminals, so nobody who matters gets blamed for stuff “going through the wrong channels”?

It’s just nasty buggers killing each other, in a “sort of criminals’ hierarchy”.

How barbaric is that, then?

I thought we were in favour of the “Rule of Law”?

No?

I am not in favour of a “State Death Penalty”. It transfers the obligation to end the life of another human to the State’s decision, which we cannot do and which we cannot delegate since we are currently not allowed that individual right. If we cannot delegate this right, not possessing it supposedly, then we cannot allow the State to allow other prisoners of it to end the life of Ian Huntley.

If we as sovereign individuals are allowed the right to end the life of those that torment and oppress us, then we can kill others, and so someone else who is aggrieved by him can kill Ian Huntley – but NOT the other prisoners. He is not their problem, and they are not his. IF he is to be kept alive by statute law, then he ought to be kept away from scumbag murderers and robbers who’d kill for a half-penny, and who think that they hate “pediatricians”.

Only the parents and relations of the girls he killed could have any traction in this one.

Wicked fascist Enemy-Class plot to promote vegetarianism


David Davis

Find a vegetarian spider and flag it as “caring”. Better, find it in a tropical rain forest.

Bah Humbug. It’ not April Fool’s day, is it, by any chance?

Being a scientist, I am not in favour of pulling down tropical rain forests, and I never have been. But to subvert and abuse animals – who like children have no power to consent to indecent acts – as pornographic devices to promote the objectives of the Enemy Class is just….sick.

It’s not even REALLY vegetarian…it “nibbles a few ant larvae from time to time”….bloody poser.

Bet you 50p it eats bacon sarnies in the night, in front of the fridge while you are asleep. Like any self-respecting spider does.

Paedophiles: Paediatricians will have to be armed in the coming endarkenment. A nice story for Christmas.


Here you go, all you people.

It may very well be all right for everyone who feels like joining a pub-drinking-group to be free to attack, main and kill, without recourse to any audit, anybody who (may have been, or was, or was said to have been, somewhere, sometime, who cares when?) involved in child abuse. Or it may not. I do not know. People of course need outlaws, otherwise how can the rest of us know if we are “in”, eh?

In the coming endarkenment, it will be hard for an ordinary TV-watcher to distinguish between an average normal state-socialised-child-abuser and a Doctor who treats children’s diseases. This confusion will be deliberately enhanced, by the Wireless Tele Vision Channels, for the purpose of maximising readership I guess that’s what it’s called?) even though almost none of the poor buggers watching it can read…..

Personally speaking, I would not, being an English Mother (let me pretend to be one for a bit) dress 10- and 11-y-o English Girls in half-naked sleb-clothes, and then send them out to shop, in pairs or groups. A seriously stupid idea whic will only lead to more trouble.

Fingerprinting of parents of nursery school children is of course, “not planned”.


David Davis

CICERO !!!

… = … Come in, Children, Eat, Relax, Obey……

I am astounded as usual, by the extent to which private outfits will sell rope to the hangmen.

As usual, Mr No-One, is planning to extend this scheme.In fact, more cleverly than is normally the case, he does not even get a mention.

Honeycomb Solutions (I bet you 50p that 90% of firms called “solutions” are hand-in-c*** glove with stalinist statists) says this. the article positively shimmers with all the statist planning buzzwords, and has prbably been written by the Department for Child Abuse Children (I expect there is one.)

As a Libertarian, one understands the concerns of the two parents of a child, for the wellbeing of their property, which is to say: the child. However, the fears of the majority about such things as abduction, molestation, paedophilia, assaults on children, and the like, all no more common now than 50 or 100 years ago, ought to be set aside in favour of the concern for civil liberty that this wedge-end-measure suggests will be the caes in more places in the future.

Who can say how long before it is used to prevent a “Fathers 4 Justice” father from getting his “kid” back from the State?